XII C 1795/13
AI generated
Court dismissed plaintiff's claim for compensation and removal of power lines after finding easement acquired by prescription.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the plaintiff's claims for compensation and the removal of power lines, ruling that the defendant had acquired an easement by prescription. The plaintiff argued the defendant lacked legal title and caused damage, but failed to prove fault or loss of value. Since the easement was validly acquired, the defendant's use was lawful, negating the basis for tort liability or compensation under civil law.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 172 k.c.; Art. 305 § 2 k.c.: An easement acquired by prescription renders the servient owner's claim for compensation or removal of the infrastructure invalid, as the servitude is lawful and no damage has been caused.
Keywords
AI generated
easement by prescription
civil law easement
tort liability
compensation claim
power line removal
good faith possession
civil procedure code
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 172 k.c.
Art. 305 § 2 k.c.
Art. 7 k.c.
Art. 415 k.c.
Art. 355 k.p.c.
Art. 100 k.p.c.
Art. 113 ust. 4 ustawy z 28 lipca 2005 r. o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
§ 6 pkt 7 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z 28 września 2002 r.
art. 200 § 1 k.p.c
art. 17 pkt 4 k.p.c