VI K 665/15
AI generated
Court imposed combined sentence for assault and threats due to distinct legal qualifications and recidivism.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court found the defendant guilty of assault and threats, imposing a combined sentence of one year and six months imprisonment. The prosecution argued for a combined penalty, while the defense likely contested the severity or method of sentencing. The court ruled for a combined sentence because the acts involved different legal interests (physical health and psychological safety) and the defendant's history of recidivism warranted a severe, preventative punishment.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 85 k.k.; Art. 86 § 1 k.k.: When multiple crimes are committed by the same person, a combined sentence is imposed if the acts differ in their legal qualification and require a synthetic assessment of the offender's behavior for preventive purposes.
Keywords
AI generated
combined sentence
assault and threats
recidivism
preventive punishment
distinct legal interests
criminal liability
imprisonment term
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 160 § 1 k.k.
Art. 157 § 2 i 4 k.k.
Art. 11 § 2 k.k.
Art. 190 § 1 k.k.
Art. 85 k.k.
Art. 86 § 1 k.k.
Art. 63 § 1 k.k.
Art. 46 § 2 k.k.
§ 14 ust. 1 pkt 1 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 28.09.2002r
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 17 ust. 1 i 2 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych
Cited Case Law
AI generatedII AKa 129/08
Appeal dismissed; combined sentence upheld as no error in sentencing or procedural handling of defendant's self-written appeal.
II AKa 183/07
IV KK 407/07
III KK 262/05
V KK 351/09