Court dismisses defendant's refusal to identify vehicle user, ruling failure to answer summons constitutes the offense.

The court upheld a conviction for failing to identify the person entrusted with a vehicle after a speed violation. The defendant argued that answering the police inquiry would expose a third party to criminal liability, citing specific judicial interpretations regarding witness protection. The court rejected this defense, stating that the risk of a traffic violation does not justify withholding information, and the defendant's silence constituted the required breach of duty.