IX Ka 896/13
AI generated
Court dismisses appeal and quashes sentence due to statute of limitations expiring before final judgment. Defendant acquitted by quashing verdict and dismissing proceedings.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court quashed the first-instance verdict and dismissed the criminal proceedings against the defendant. The defendant was charged with intentionally damaging a vehicle with a rifle, but the defense argued for a new expert opinion on the ballistic evidence. The court ruled that the statute of limitations for prosecuting the offense had expired on June 18, 2013, rendering the defendant no longer liable.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 45 § 1 kw; Art. 5 § 1 pkt 4 kpsw: When the statute of limitations for prosecuting an offense expires before the final judgment, the proceedings must be dismissed and the prior verdict quashed.
Keywords
AI generated
statute of limitations
quashing of verdict
dismissal of proceedings
criminal appeal
expiry of liability
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 45 § 1 kw
Art. 5 § 1 pkt 4 kpsw
Art. 118 § 2 kpsw
Art. 634 kpk
Art. 119 kpsw