Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III C 1602/14 AI generated

Court dismisses plaintiff's claim for payment against defendant, upholding a prior default judgment on debt.

Case Number III C 1602/14
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiff's lawsuit for payment, upholding a previous default judgment rendered in March 2013. The plaintiff, E. G., sued defendant R. M. for monetary compensation, while the defendant argued against the validity of the earlier ruling. The court rejected the plaintiff's appeal, confirming that the initial judgment against the defendant remained legally binding and enforceable.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: A final judgment cannot be overturned on appeal if the appeal is based on a claim that contradicts the established facts or if the appeal fails to meet statutory requirements for reopening the case.

Keywords

AI generated
civil appeal procedure default judgment enforcement dismissal of claim finality of judgment monetary compensation dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt: III C 1602/14 WYROK W IMIENIU RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ Dnia 28 maja 2015 roku Sąd Rejonowy Szczecin – Prawobrzeże i Zachód w Szczecinie w III Wydziale Cywilnym w składzie następującym: Przewodniczący: SSR Szymon Stępień Protokolant: sekr. sąd. Agnieszka Dunaj po rozpoznaniu w dniu 28 maja 2015 roku w Szczecinie na rozprawie sprawy z powództwa E. G. przeciwko R. M. o zapłatę I. uchyla wyrok zaoczny z dnia 19 marca 2013 roku, wydany w sprawie o sygn. akt III C 2335/12; II. oddala powództwo.