Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
IX GC 1902/11 AI generated

Contractor's work not matching contract terms implies professional contractor should have claimed before litigation.

Case Number IX GC 1902/11
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court ruled that a contractor performing work inconsistent with the contract must have filed a claim as a professional party. The plaintiff argued the work was defective, while the defendant contended no formal objection was raised. The court held that a professional contractor's silence on obvious defects implies acceptance or waiver of the right to claim later.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 445 § 1 k.c.; Art. 446 § 1 k.c.: A professional contractor who performs work visibly non-conforming to the contract is deemed to have waived the right to claim damages if they fail to raise a formal objection or demand rectification before the dispute arises.

Keywords

AI generated
professional contractor duty implied waiver of claim contractual non-conformity pre-litigation objection professional standard of care

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 445 § 1 k.c.
Art. 446 § 1 k.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Oczywiste wydaje się to, że w sytuacji, w której wykonywane przez powoda prace w rzeczywistości nie byłyby zgodne z zawartą pomiędzy stronami umową, to pozwany jako profesjonalista z pewnością złożyłby stosowną reklamacje lub wezwał powoda do usunięcia niedoróbek jeszcze przed wszczęciem procesu.