IV Ka 216/15
AI generated
Appeal against conviction for theft upheld; court rejects defense arguments and confirms original sentence.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court upheld the first-instance conviction for theft against the defendant H. K. The defense appealed the sentence, but the court found no merit in their arguments regarding the facts or legal application. Consequently, the original judgment was confirmed, and the defendant was ordered to pay court fees and procedural costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 97 k.k.; Art. 109 § 2 k.p.w.: The court of appeal reviews the lower court's decision on facts and law; if the conviction and sentence are correct and the defense arguments are unfounded, the original judgment is upheld.
Keywords
AI generated
theft conviction
criminal appeal
appellate review
court fees
procedural costs
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 97 k.k.
Art. 109 § 2 k.p.w.
Art. 437 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 119 k.p.w.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 8 and Art. 21 pkt 2 of the Act on court fees in criminal proceedings