Court acquits defendant of embezzlement due to lack of evidence proving unauthorized taking of leased equipment.

The court acquitted the defendant of embezzlement charges regarding leased equipment, ruling that the prosecution failed to prove the unauthorized taking occurred. The defendant argued the charge was based on vague contract descriptions and occurred while he was abroad, contradicting the prosecution's timeline. The court found no evidence that the specific items were missing or taken, noting witnesses could not identify the equipment and the defendant's explanations remained unchallenged.