Court acquits defendant for road obstruction offense due to missing statutory elements and lack of intent evidence.

The appellate court overturned the first-instance conviction, acquitting the defendant of the road obstruction offense. The defendant argued the lower court erred in factually establishing the crime, while the prosecution maintained the defendant was liable for failing to mark a road defect. The court ruled that the lower court's description of the act lacked the specific statutory definition required by the law and that no evidence proved the defendant knew of the defect or should have known, thus negating criminal intent.