Court dismissed appeal on speeding and seatbelt violation, upholding original conviction and costs order.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's appeal against a first-instance conviction for speeding and failure to wear a seatbelt. The defense argued that radar speed measurements were invalid due to procedural flaws and lack of calibration certificates, but the court found the police officer's testimony credible and the expert opinion confirmed the device's reliability. Consequently, the court upheld the original verdict and ordered the defendant to pay the state's legal costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 97 kw w zw. z art. 39 ust. 1 Prawa o ruchu drogowym; Art. 92a kw; Art. 109 § 2 k.p.s.w.: The court of appeal upholds a first-instance judgment on traffic violations when the expert opinion confirms the validity of radar measurements and the defendant fails to prove procedural errors or improper use of the measuring device.