Appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction for dog negligence and identity refusal due to free evidence assessment.

The appellate court dismissed the defendant's appeal against a conviction for dog negligence and refusal to provide identification. The defendant argued that the lower court arbitrarily valued police testimony while ignoring his own explanations and failed to order an inspection of the dogs. The court rejected these claims, affirming that the lower court's evaluation of evidence was logical, reasonable, and protected under the law, and that the defendant's failure to present documents constituted a violation of the identity obligation regardless of the officers' prior knowledge. Consequently, the conviction and fine were upheld, but the defendant was exempted from paying the appeal costs due to his low income.