Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I C 54/13 AI generated

Civil court dismisses claim for damages against a court for alleged personal rights violations without proof of specific harm.

Case Number I C 54/13
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The plaintiff J. A. sued the Regional Court for 500,000 PLN in damages and compensation for alleged procedural violations and personal rights infringements. She claimed the court systematically obstructed her access to justice and acted as a private interest group, but failed to specify concrete instances of personal rights violation. The court dismissed the claim because the plaintiff did not prove that any personal rights were actually infringed or that the court issued unlawful judgments, noting that subjective dissatisfaction is insufficient for liability.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 § 1 k.c.; Art. 415 k.c.; Art. 417(1) § 2 k.c.: A claim for damages for personal rights infringement requires objective proof of a specific violation, not merely subjective dissatisfaction with judicial proceedings or general allegations of systemic misconduct.

Keywords

AI generated
personal rights infringement judicial liability damages claim procedural violations public authority evidence burden unlawful judgment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 § 1 k.c.
Art. 415 k.c.
Art. 417(1) § 2 k.c.
Art. 113 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 28 lipca 2005 r. o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
Art. 98 § 1 kpc
art. 232 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text