I C 982/12
AI generated
Court dismissed plaintiff's claim against principal contractor and academy for subcontractor's unpaid work costs.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the plaintiff's lawsuit seeking payment for subcontracted renovation and modernization work from both the principal contractor and the academy. The plaintiff argued that the principal contractor was liable, while the defendant contended that the director's signature on the subcontract did not create joint liability. The court ruled that the director's actions indicated knowledge of the relationship but did not establish joint responsibility, leaving the subcontractor to bear the risk of non-payment.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 410 k.c.; Art. 647 § 5 k.c.: A principal contractor is not jointly liable to a subcontractor for unpaid remuneration merely because a director signed the subcontract, as the subcontractor assumed the risk of non-payment.
Keywords
AI generated
subcontractor liability
joint and several liability
principal contractor
unpaid remuneration
director authority
contractual risk
construction law
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 647 § 5 k.c.
Art. 98 k.p.c.
§ 6 pkt 7 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 28 września 2002 roku
art. 6471 §5 k.c
art. 6471 k.c
art. 551§1 k.s.h
art. 6471§1 k.c
art. 647 k.c
art. 647§2 k.c
art. 60 k.c