Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III K 106/14 AI generated

Court acquits defendants of forgery and coercion charges due to lack of evidence proving the accused instigated the acts.

Case Number III K 106/14
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court acquitted both defendants, M.T. and Z.H., of charges regarding forgery and coercion related to a disputed loan agreement. The prosecution alleged that Z.H. instigated M.T. to forge documents, but the court found no evidence that Z.H. encouraged M.T. to sign in M.M.'s name since M.M. was present. Consequently, the court determined the alleged criminal acts did not occur and issued acquittals under the relevant criminal procedure code. Finally, the state was ordered to pay the costs of the appointed defense lawyers for both acquitted parties.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 17 § 1 pkt 1 K.p.k.; Art. 310 § 1 k.k.; Art. 270 § 1 k.k.; Art. 18 § 3 k.k.; Art. 632 § 2 K.p.k.: Where evidence is insufficient to prove that the accused instigated or committed the alleged criminal acts, the court must acquit the defendant, and the state bears the costs of the public prosecution proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
insufficient evidence acquittal of forgery lack of instigation state bears costs criminal procedure code public prosecution unpaid legal aid

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 17 § 1 pkt 1 K.p.k.
Art. 310 § 1 k.k.
Art. 270 § 1 k.k.
Art. 18 § 3 k.k.
Art. 632 § 2 K.p.k.
Art. 29 ust. 1 Prawo o adwokaturze
§ 19 pkt 1 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 28 września 2002 roku
art. 18 § 3 k.k
art. 310 § 1 k.k
art. 270 §1 k.k

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text