KIO 707/14 AI generated

Public procurement court voids tender winner selection due to bidders failing economic criteria and submitting false financial data.

Case Number KIO 707/14

Court / Authority Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2014-04-28

Outcome Allowed / Granted

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The National Reconsideration Chamber allowed the appeal, ordering the contracting authority to void the selection of the most advantageous offer and repeat the evaluation process. The court found that two bidders, Skanska and Elektrobudowa, were excluded because they failed to meet economic and financial requirements or submitted false information regarding their financial status. Consequently, the court ruled that the initial selection was invalid and mandated a new evaluation excluding these non-compliant bidders.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 ust. 2 pkt 3, 4 ustawy Pzp; Art. 192 ust. 2, 3 pkt 1, 9, 10 ustawy Pzp: The court must void the selection of the most advantageous offer and order a new evaluation when bidders fail to meet economic/financial criteria or submit false information, as this constitutes a ground for exclusion under public procurement law.

Keywords

AI generated

public procurement law exclusion of bidders false financial information economic and financial status voiding tender decision National Reconsideration Chamber repetition of evaluation

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Art. 24 ust. 2 pkt 3, 4 ustawy Pzp

Art. 192 ust. 2, 3 pkt 1 ustawy Pzp

Art. 192 ust. 9, 10 ustawy Pzp

Art. 89 ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy Pzp

Art. 26 ust. 3 ustawy Pzp

Public procurement court voids tender winner selection due to bidders failing economic criteria and submitting false financial data.

Legislator summary

Legislator headnote

Keywords

Cited Legislation

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Full text