Legislator Case Law & Legislation
KIO 1395/12 AI generated

Court allows contractor appeals, ruling public authority cannot reject bids based on unfair competition presumptions.

Case Number KIO 1395/12
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The National Court of Appeal dismissed the contracting authority's objections against three service providers while allowing appeals from two other contractors. The authority had rejected offers based on a presumption of unfair competition among related companies, arguing they constituted a single economic entity. The court held that such presumptions are insufficient without concrete evidence and that the authority failed to prove the specific legal requirements for rejection under the Public Procurement Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 89 ust. 1 pkt 3 ustawy Pzp; Art. 192 ust. 1, 2 i ust. 3 pkt 1 ustawy Pzp: The contracting authority cannot reject a tender based on mere presumptions of unfair competition; it must prove specific circumstances, and the existence of related companies does not automatically constitute unfair competition.

Keywords

AI generated
public procurement law unfair competition presumption tender rejection grounds related companies contracting authority duty procedural error public tender evaluation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 89 ust. 1 pkt 3 ustawy Pzp
Art. 192 ust. 1, 2 i ust. 3 pkt 1 ustawy Pzp
Art. 192 ust. 9 i 10 ustawy Pzp
Dz. U. Nr 41, poz. 238

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Sąd Okręgowy w Poznaniu, Wydział X Gospodarczy Odwoławczy, sygn. akt X Ga 706/11
I FSK 499/06
I FSK 1946/07
I CSK 199/09
Supreme Court allows claim by ordering expert opinion on damages despite counsel's failure to request it.
X Ga 706/11

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text