Legislator Case Law & Legislation
KIO 354/11 AI generated

Public procurement court allows appeal, ordering tenderer to re-evaluate offers due to flawed scoring formula.

Case Number KIO 354/11
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The National Reconsideration Chamber allowed the appeal filed by PROMED S.A. against the tendering authority's decision to award a CT scanner contract. The authority had rejected offers below a minimum threshold but used a scoring formula that inadvertently awarded points to such rejected offers. The court found this violated the tender specifications and the principle of equal treatment, necessitating a re-evaluation of all bids using the correct formula.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 91 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 29 stycznia 2004 r. Prawo zamówień publicznych; Art. 7 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 29 stycznia 2004 r. Prawo zamówień publicznych: A tendering authority must strictly adhere to its own specifications; failure to apply a scoring formula that correctly excludes offers below minimum thresholds constitutes a legal violation requiring the re-evaluation of offers.

Keywords

AI generated
public procurement law tender specifications scoring formula error minimum threshold rejection equal treatment principle re-evaluation of offers National Reconsideration Chamber

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 198a and 198b of the Public Procurement Law of January 29, 2004
Art. 182 para. 2 of the Public Procurement Law of January 29, 2004
Art. 91 para. 1 of the Public Procurement Law of January 29, 2004
Art. 7 para. 1 of the Public Procurement Law of January 29, 2004
Art. 192 para. 9 and 10 of the Public Procurement Law of January 29, 2004

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text