ECLI:NL:RBDOR:2012:BY6403
ECLI:NL:RBDOR:2012:BY6403
AI generated
Insurance court awards damages for misrepresentation of investment returns in mixed life insurance policy.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court ruled that the insurer failed in its duty of care by misleading the policyholder regarding investment performance. While the claim for damages based on breach of contract was rejected, the court found a tortious act due to the significant discrepancy between the promised 8% return and the actual 0.21% achieved over ten years. Consequently, damages for the loss of state pension were awarded, but costs for disputed collection fees were denied.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArticles 6:162 and 6:218 of the Civil Code; The insurer's duty of care requires accurate disclosure of investment risks, and misleading representations regarding guaranteed returns constitute a tortious act when actual performance falls drastically short of projections.
Keywords
AI generated
duty of care insurance
misrepresentation investment returns
tortious act breach
state pension loss
mixed life insurance policy
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArticle 7:418 jo 7:427 of the Civil Code
Article 6:162 of the Civil Code
Article 6:218 of the Civil Code
artikel 7:401 BW
artikel 7:400 BW
Related Decisions
AI generatedECLI:NL:RBOBR:2023:401
Court allows claim against insurer for misleading insurance product and reduces damages by 15% for client's own fault.
ECLI:NL:RBROT:2021:4478
Court dismisses life insurance claim where insured breached duty of disclosure regarding brain symptoms.
ECLI:NL:RBARN:2012:BX3609
ECLI:NL:RBARN:2012:BX3609 Rechtbank Arnhem , 20-06-2012 / 212406
ECLI:NL:RBROT:2014:2862
Court holds two companies jointly liable for damages and orders each to pay 50% of the other's share in indemnity cases.
ECLI:NL:RBZWB:2016:1624
Court finds contractor breached contract in 2009 and 2012, ordering damages and costs.