Court dismisses claims for non-compete enforcement and damages against former employees for alleged business poaching.

The court dismissed Benkey's claims against CLOU Capital and two former employees regarding alleged breach of non-compete and confidentiality obligations. Benkey alleged that the employees systematically and substantially damaged its business by using confidential information to poach clients, but failed to provide sufficient evidence. The judge found that the evidence was insufficient to prove such damage and noted that the requested relief effectively sought to extend the existing employment contract's non-compete period, which the employee had explicitly waived. Consequently, Benkey was ordered to pay the opposing parties' legal costs.