ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2020:7274
ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2020:7274
AI generated
Court orders private security firm to pay back wages and severance to two dismissed employees under collective agreement rules.
Netherlands (NL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court ruled in favor of two security employees who were dismissed by their private security company without a proper new employment offer. The employer failed to comply with Article 95B of the Collective Labour Agreement (cao) Particuliere Beveiliging, which mandates offering new contracts to displaced workers. Consequently, the court ordered the company to pay outstanding wages, a 25% statutory increase, and provide a salary breakdown.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 95B cao Particuliere Beveiliging; Where an employer fails to offer a new employment contract to displaced workers in accordance with the collective agreement, the court may order payment of back wages and a statutory increase.
Keywords
AI generated
collective labour agreement
private security sector
employee dismissal
back wages payment
statutory increase
cao Particuliere Beveiliging
employment continuity
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 95B cao Particuliere Beveiliging
Art. 7:625 BW
artikel 7:625 BW
Related Decisions
AI generatedECLI:NL:RBAMS:2025:8301
Court dismisses interim security claims by security firms against airport operator for lack of evidence.
ECLI:NL:RBOVE:2018:2069
Court dismisses severance claim where employee's serious criminal suspicion justifies immediate termination without notice.
ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2021:7113
Court dismisses union claim that new security firm must adopt rival's rostering system for transferred staff.
ECLI:NL:RBNHO:2021:9156
Court dismisses employee's claim of business transfer due to insufficient staff continuity and illness.
ECLI:NL:RBNHO:2019:7598
Court dismisses airport's claim that union strike threats violate public procurement rules due to lack of proven social risk.