Tenant eviction allowed; penalty clause in lease voided as unfair under consumer protection law.

The court ordered the tenant to vacate the property and pay usage fees but rejected the claim for a penalty based on drug cultivation. The landlord argued the lease clause allowed for a ten-month rent penalty for any criminal activity, while the tenant contended the clause was unfair. The court ruled that because the tenant is a consumer, the broad and disproportionate penalty clause must be deemed unfair and void under EU and Dutch law.