ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2017:7077
ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2017:7077
AI generated
Court dismisses claim to annul trust deed amendment, ruling it valid and not materially prejudicial to note holders.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the plaintiff's request to annul an amendment to the trust deed and Terms. The defendant argued the amendment violated civil code provisions regarding material prejudice, while the plaintiff contended it was an invalid alteration of rights. The court held that the amendment merely clarified the Trustee's powers and did not materially prejudice the interests of the note holders, rendering the plaintiff's claims without legal basis.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArticles 3:45 and 6:160 of the Civil Code; where a trust deed amendment only clarifies the Trustee's powers without materially prejudicing the interests of the beneficiaries, the amendment remains legally valid and cannot be annulled.
Keywords
AI generated
trust deed amendment
material prejudice
Civil Code annulment
note holder rights
provisional relief
Trustee powers
relative effect
Cited Legislation
AI generatedarticle 3:45 of the Civil Code
article 6:160 of the Civil Code
article 217 of the Code of Civil Procedure
artikel 217 Rv
artikel 6:159 BW
artikel 3:45 BW
Cited Case Law
AI generatedNJ 2003/715
Related Decisions
AI generatedECLI:NL:RBAMS:2013:6239
Court orders pension fund manager to pay damages for unauthorized portfolio liquidation despite exemption clause.
ECLI:NL:RBROT:2015:8495
ECLI:NL:RBROT:2015:8495 Rechtbank Rotterdam , 18-11-2015 / C/10/421779 / HA ZA 13-373
ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2012:BX8774
Court orders asset manager to pay pension funds damages for investment losses without reducing liability for client's own fault.
ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2024:484
Court dismisses expert fee claim as unreasonable given case uncertainty and alternative damage assessment timing.
ECLI:NL:RBLIM:2025:1137
Court rejects defendant's forum selection clause, affirming Dutch jurisdiction under Brussels I-bis Article 4.