Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2017:6431 ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2017:6431 AI generated

Court dismisses tenant's eviction claim and allows WeWork to continue lease for two months after notice.

Case Number ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2017:6431
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Netherlands (NL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiff's primary claim that no valid termination occurred because the defendant's letter used 'departure' instead of 'eviction,' ruling the message sufficiently clear. While the plaintiff's request for eviction was rejected, the court granted a two-month extension of the lease to allow the plaintiff time to apply for tenancy protection. Consequently, the defendant WeWork was ordered to continue the agreement under original terms for that period.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 7:230a lid 1 BW; Art. 7:230a lid 2 BW: A termination notice is valid if it clearly expresses the intent to end the contract, even if it omits specific legal terminology like 'eviction' in favor of 'departure', provided the message is unambiguous to the recipient.

Keywords

AI generated
termination notice clarity tenancy protection application lease extension period eviction terminology business premises lease

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 7:230a lid 1 BW
Art. 7:230a lid 2 BW
artikel 7:230a BW
artikel 7:290 BW
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text