Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2017:3315 ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2017:3315 AI generated

Court corrects criminal sentence from seven years three months to seventy-two months due to clerical error.

Case Number ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2017:3315
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Netherlands (NL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court issued a restorative judgment to correct a clerical error in a prior criminal verdict. The original judgment mistakenly stated a sentence of seven years and three months instead of seventy-two months. The court ruled that this discrepancy constituted a clear mistake requiring immediate correction to ensure the defendant received the intended punishment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 360 of the Criminal Procedure Code; Article 361 of the Criminal Procedure Code: A clear clerical error in the duration of a prison sentence mandates a restorative judgment to align the written decision with the intended term.

Keywords

AI generated
clerical error restorative judgment criminal procedure sentence correction clear mistake prison term judicial rectification

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 360 of the Criminal Procedure Code
Article 361 of the Criminal Procedure Code
AI generated
ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2021:7989
Court dismisses execution of suspended sentence due to lack of necessity after long supervision period.
ECLI:NL:RBOBR:2024:74
Court allows confiscation order based on plea agreement, validating waiver of defense rights and fair trial rights.
ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2019:187
Court dismisses execution of suspended sentence due to breach but allows second clinical admission for dual diagnosis.
ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2017:2602
Detention lifted; State ordered to pay costs for unjustified delay in executing suspended sentence.
ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2023:7597
Amsterdam Court refuses surrender under Art. 12 OLW due to lack of notification for appeal proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

RECHTBANK AMSTERDAM Parketnummers: 13/680262-15 en 09/819237-14 (tul) HERSTELVONNIS Herstelvonnis gewezen naar aanleiding van het op 15 mei 2017 door de meervoudige kamer van de rechtbank Amsterdam gewezen vonnis in de strafzaak tegen [verdachte] geboren te [geboorteplaats] op [geboortedatum] 1992, zonder vaste woon- of verblijfplaats in Nederland, verblijvende op het adres [adres] [woonplaats] . De rechtbank is na het wijzen van het vonnis in de zaak met bovengenoemd parketnummers gebleken dat in het vonnis op pagina 39 staat: “Veroordeelt verdachte tot een gevangenisstraf van 7 (zeven) jaar en 3 (drie) maanden”. Dit dient te zijn: “Veroordeelt verdachte tot een gevangenisstraf van 87 (zevenentachtig) maanden”. Het betreft hier een kennelijke misslag. Dit herstelvonnis is op 16 mei 2017 gewezen door mr. J. Piena, voorzitter, mrs. E.M.M. Gabel en E. Dinjens, rechters, in tegenwoordigheid van mr. C.F.E.M. Mes, griffier.