ECLI:NL:PHR:2020:769
ECLI:NL:PHR:2020:769
AI generated
Dutch court upholds conviction for money laundering and confiscation of property exceeding legal value.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of the Netherlands rejected the cassation appeal against a conviction for money laundering and the confiscation of the defendant's property. The court confirmed that the defendant converted over €263,830 into luxury goods while suspecting illegal origins, and that home improvements attached to the property constituted part of its value. Consequently, the court ruled that the property was subject to confiscation, with any excess value above the legal threshold to be returned to the defendant.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 33a Sr; Art. 33c Sr: The court may confiscate property used in or derived from crime, including home improvements, and return excess value above the legal threshold to the defendant.
Keywords
AI generated
money laundering conviction
property confiscation
excess value restitution
home improvements
criminal asset recovery
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 33a Sr
Art. 33c Sr
Art. 81 RO
art. 33c Sr
artikel 33c van het Wetboek van Strafrecht
art. 3:1 BW
art. 24 Sr
Cited Case Law
AI generatedHR 18 januari 1994, ECLI:NL:HR:1994:AD2019
HR 23 november 2010, ECLI:NL:HR:2010:BN0578
Dutch court rejects appeal on money laundering conviction where defendant reasonably suspected criminal origin of funds.
ECLI:NL:HR:1994:AD2019
NJ 1994/337
ECLI:NL:HR:2010:BN0578
Dutch court rejects appeal on money laundering conviction where defendant reasonably suspected criminal origin of funds.
NJ 2011/44