Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ECLI:NL:PHR:1964:2 ECLI:NL:PHR:1964:2 AI generated

Cassation appeal dismissed because the Prosecutor lacks standing to appeal a Court of Appeal decision.

Case Number ECLI:NL:PHR:1964:2
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Netherlands (NL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Justice declared the prosecutor's cassation request inadmissible due to a lack of legal standing. The prosecutor argued for review of the Court of Appeal's decision regarding his own appeal, but the court noted he does not represent the State in that capacity. Consequently, the request was rejected as the prosecutor is not authorized to initiate cassation proceedings in this context.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Articles 3:30, 3:31, 3:32 Civil Code; The prosecutor of the court district lacks the right of appeal to the High Court of Justice and cannot initiate cassation proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
prosecutor standing cassation appeal legal standing High Court of Justice procedural admissibility

Cited Case Law

AI generated
H.R. 12 January 1931
H.R. 13 May 1949

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

S No.3579/376. Mr. van Oosten. Conclusie inzake: DE OFFICIER VAN JUSTITIE IN HET ARRONDISSEMENT ARNHEM. Edelhoogachtbare Heren, De requestrant was wel bevoegd in hoger beroep te komen van de beschikking van de Rechtbank van 4 dec. 1963, genomen op het verzoekschrift, dat door hem in zijn hoedanigheid van Officier van Justitie bij dat college tot hetzelve was gericht, maar hij mist het rechtsmiddel van cassatie met betrekking tot de op zijn appel gegeven beschikking van het Hof d.d. 6 maart 1964. De Officier van Justitie vertegenwoordigt immers niet het O.M. bij den Hove (vgl. H.R. 12 jan. 1931, N.J. 1931, p. 758, n. E.M. M. en 13 mei 1949, N. J. 1949, no. 393) . Derhalve kan de requestrant niet worden ontvangen, zodat mijn conclusie strekt tot niet-ontvankelijkverklaring van de requestrant in zijn request. Parket, 6 mei 1964. De Procureur-Generaal bij de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden,