ECLI:NL:OGHACMB:2025:227
ECLI:NL:OGHACMB:2025:227
AI generated
Court dismisses appeal on interim claim, orders expert report for construction cost disputes under UAV-GC 2005.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed Sona's appeal regarding an interim claim for bank guarantee costs, finding no evidence of financial loss. The court held that parties are not bound by the Dispute Adjudication Board's decisions after issuing a notice of dissatisfaction. Consequently, the court ordered the appointment of an expert to determine the correct payment amounts under the contract and UAV-GC 2005.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedUAV-GC 2005; Dispute Adjudication Board: Parties are not bound by DAB decisions after issuing a notice of dissatisfaction; interim claims without proven loss are dismissed; expert appointment required for payment determination.
Keywords
AI generated
construction contract disputes
interim claim dismissal
notice of dissatisfaction
UAV-GC 2005
expert appointment order
Dispute Adjudication Board
financial loss proof
Cited Legislation
AI generatedUAV-GC 2005
Cited Case Law
AI generatedHR 3 juni 2022, ECLI:NL:HR:2022:824
Dutch Supreme Court rules that appeal document length limits are lawful if accompanied by sufficient legal protection mechanisms.
ECLI:NL:OGEAC:2017:182
Construction contract dispute where court dismissed part of claim due to lack of specific amount justification.
ECLI:NL:OGEAC:2018:119
GERECHT IN EERSTE AANLEG VAN CURAÇAO VONNIS IN KORT GEDING In de zaak van: de stichting Stichting SONA gevestigd te Curaçao eiseres gemachtigde: mr.
ECLI:NL:OGEAC:2020:32
Court dismisses claim for interim return of bank guarantee due to lack of serious interest and procedural timing issues.
ECLI:NL:OGHACMB:2020:243
Burgerlijke zaken over 2020 Vonnis no.: Registratienummers: CUR202000211 – CUR2020H00072 Uitspraak: 13 oktober 2020 GEMEENSCHAPPELIJK HOF VAN JUSTITIE van Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten en van Bonaire, Sint Eustatius en Saba V O N N I S I N K O R T G E D I N G in de zaak van de vennootschap naar Nederlands recht BALLAST NEDAM INFRA B.V., gevestigd in Nieuwegein, Nederland, hierna: BNI, in eerste aanleg eiseres, thans appellant, gemachtigde: mr. J.A.M. Burgers, tegen de stichting STICHTING SONA, gevestigd in Curaçao, hierna: SONA, in eerste aanleg gedaagde, thans geïntimeerde, gemachtigden: mrs.
ECLI:NL:OGHACMB:2022:113
Appeal dismissed; Dispute Adjudication Board decision upheld as reasonably motivated and binding on parties.
ECLI:NL:OGHACMB:2022:114
Appeal dismissed; Dispute Adjudication Board decision upheld as binding and sufficiently motivated.