Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ECLI:NL:OGHACMB:2025:227 ECLI:NL:OGHACMB:2025:227 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal on interim claim, orders expert report for construction cost disputes under UAV-GC 2005.

Case Number ECLI:NL:OGHACMB:2025:227
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Netherlands (NL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed Sona's appeal regarding an interim claim for bank guarantee costs, finding no evidence of financial loss. The court held that parties are not bound by the Dispute Adjudication Board's decisions after issuing a notice of dissatisfaction. Consequently, the court ordered the appointment of an expert to determine the correct payment amounts under the contract and UAV-GC 2005.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

UAV-GC 2005; Dispute Adjudication Board: Parties are not bound by DAB decisions after issuing a notice of dissatisfaction; interim claims without proven loss are dismissed; expert appointment required for payment determination.

Keywords

AI generated
construction contract disputes interim claim dismissal notice of dissatisfaction UAV-GC 2005 expert appointment order Dispute Adjudication Board financial loss proof

Cited Legislation

AI generated
UAV-GC 2005

Cited Case Law

AI generated
HR 3 juni 2022, ECLI:NL:HR:2022:824
Dutch Supreme Court rules that appeal document length limits are lawful if accompanied by sufficient legal protection mechanisms.
ECLI:NL:OGEAC:2017:182
Construction contract dispute where court dismissed part of claim due to lack of specific amount justification.
ECLI:NL:OGEAC:2018:119
GERECHT IN EERSTE AANLEG VAN CURAÇAO VONNIS IN KORT GEDING In de zaak van: de stichting Stichting SONA gevestigd te Curaçao eiseres gemachtigde: mr.
ECLI:NL:OGEAC:2020:32
Court dismisses claim for interim return of bank guarantee due to lack of serious interest and procedural timing issues.
ECLI:NL:OGHACMB:2020:243
Burgerlijke zaken over 2020 Vonnis no.: Registratienummers: CUR202000211 – CUR2020H00072 Uitspraak: 13 oktober 2020 GEMEENSCHAPPELIJK HOF VAN JUSTITIE van Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten en van Bonaire, Sint Eustatius en Saba V O N N I S I N K O R T G E D I N G in de zaak van de vennootschap naar Nederlands recht BALLAST NEDAM INFRA B.V., gevestigd in Nieuwegein, Nederland, hierna: BNI, in eerste aanleg eiseres, thans appellant, gemachtigde: mr. J.A.M. Burgers, tegen de stichting STICHTING SONA, gevestigd in Curaçao, hierna: SONA, in eerste aanleg gedaagde, thans geïntimeerde, gemachtigden: mrs.
ECLI:NL:OGHACMB:2022:113
Appeal dismissed; Dispute Adjudication Board decision upheld as reasonably motivated and binding on parties.
ECLI:NL:OGHACMB:2022:114
Appeal dismissed; Dispute Adjudication Board decision upheld as binding and sufficiently motivated.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text