Court dismisses pedestrian's appeal, upholding 50% liability split due to driver's speed and pedestrian's lack of caution.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appellants' appeal, confirming the lower court's rejection of their claim for additional damages. The appellants, new residents of Aruba, argued they suffered more harm than the insurer paid, while the respondent maintained the driver was at fault for excessive speed and poor lighting adaptation. The court ruled that the appellants failed to exercise sufficient caution as pedestrians and that the driver's negligence was not severe enough to warrant more than half liability.