Social benefits appeal dismissed; applicant failed to prove inability to work due to illness.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against the Court of Appeal's decision regarding the applicant's entitlement to income-related benefits. The applicant, a French national, argued that his illness prevented him from working and thus he should receive benefits under Article 8a of the General Act on Income-Related Benefits. The court rejected this claim because the applicant failed to provide sufficient medical evidence proving his inability to work during the relevant period.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArticle 8a of the General Act on Income-Related Benefits; Article 10 of the General Administrative Law Act: The court held that an applicant must substantiate their claim of inability to work with concrete medical evidence to qualify for income-related benefits.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
gewezen op het beroep in cassatie van X te Z, Frankrijk, tegen de uitspraak van het Gerechtshof te 's-Hertogenbosch van 12 mei 2010, nr. 09/00449, betreffende een beschikking als bedoeld in artikel 8a van de Algemene wet inkomensafhankelijke regelingen.