Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 15249/2026 — snpen AI generated

Cassation appeal dismissed due to missing special power of attorney for the defense lawyer.

Case Number Ordinanza — n. 15249/2026 — snpen
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Italy (IT)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court declared the cassation appeal inadmissible because the defense lawyer lacked a special power of attorney required to file the appeal. The appellant, Canali Mishelle, submitted the request without the necessary procedural document mandated by Article 610, paragraph 5-bis of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, and the appellant was ordered to pay court costs and a fine to the Cassation Fund.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 610, comma 5-bis, cod. proc. pen.: A cassation appeal is inadmissible if the defense lawyer has not provided a special power of attorney, as this specific document is a mandatory prerequisite for filing the appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
special power of attorney cassation appeal inadmissibility defense lawyer requirements Code of Criminal Procedure procedural defect court costs award Cassation Fund fine

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 610, comma 5-bis, cod. proc. pen.
Letto il ricorso di Canali Mishelle; Rilevato che, stante la mancanza della procura speciale al difensore per proporre ricorso in Cassazione, si versa in una delle ipotesi di cui all'art. 610, comma 5-bis, cod.
AI generated
Ordinanza — n. 6340/2026 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal as inadmissible for generic legal criticism without challenging evidence or factual reconstruction.
Ordinanza — n. 7471/2026 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to failure to raise confiscation grounds in second instance.
Ordinanza — n. 34422/2025 — snpen
Italian Supreme Court dismisses appeal on fraud bankruptcy charges for offering alternative fact reconstruction without legal error.
Ordinanza — n. 12382/2024 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal for aggravated assault, rejecting failure to cite witness testimony as procedural error.
Ordinanza — n. 35615/2024 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to manifestly unfounded evasion charges and lack of factual re-evaluation powers.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

nato a ROMA il 22/11/1998 avverso la sentenza del 23/06/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di ROMA dato avviso alle parti; udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere GIOVANNI ARIOLLI;RITENUTO IN FATTO E

CONSIDERATO IN DIRITTO

Letto il ricorso di Canali Mishelle; Rilevato che, stante la mancanza della procura speciale al difensore per proporre ricorso in Cassazione, si versa in una delle ipotesi di cui all'art. 610, comma 5-bis, cod. proc. pen. tale per cui va dichiarata l'inammissibilità del ricorso; rilevato, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile con condanna della ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. P. P.Q.MGiov nni Aiòli Maria Daniela Borsellino 2