Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sentenza — n. 15230/2026 — snpen AI generated

Criminal appeal dismissed because the victim remitted the complaint, extinguishing the crime under procedural law.

Case Number Sentenza — n. 15230/2026 — snpen
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Italy (IT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court annulled the lower court's conviction without remanding the case because the victim had remitted the criminal complaint. The victim's remission and the defendant's acceptance triggered the statutory extinction of the offense under Article 129 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was ordered to bear the litigation costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 129 c.p.p.; Art. 100 c.p.p.: When the victim remits the criminal complaint and the accused accepts it, the crime is extinguished, requiring the annulment of the conviction without remand.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal complaint remission extinction of crime procedural extinction annulment without remand victim's acceptance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 129 c.p.p.
Art. 100 c.p.p.
art. 129 cod. proc. pen
AI generated
Sentenza — n. 36231/2024 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed because the crime was extinguished by the victim's withdrawal of the private prosecution.
Sentenza — n. 47255/2022 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed because the crime was extinguished by a subsequent mutual remission of complaints.
Sentenza — n. 28898/2024 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed; court annuls conviction due to post-sentence withdrawal of private prosecution.
Sentenza — n. 28867/2024 — snpen
Cassation court annuls conviction for theft due to post-sentence withdrawal of complaint by victim.
Sentenza — n. 14859/2025 — snpen
Cassation annuls appeal judgment because the crime was extinguished by the remission of the private prosecution complaint.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

osto da: CATALANO FILOMENA nato a VENEZIA il 14/02/1980 avverso la sentenza del 15/05/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di CAMPOBASSO dato avviso alle parti; udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere GIOVANNI ARIOLLI;RITENUTO IN FATTO E

CONSIDERATO IN DIRITTO

Letto il ricorso di Catalano Filomena; Rilevato che si procede per reato perseguibile a querela; Vista la remissione della querela della persona offesa di cui al verbale CC della Stazione di Campobasso del 10/03/2026 e l'accettazione dell'imputata di cui al verbale CC della Stazione di Perugia il 16/03/2026; rilevato, pertanto, che è sopravvenuta una causa di estinzione del reato, da rilevarsi, a cura del Collegio, ai sensi dell'art. 129 cod. proc. pen.; che, pertanto, va disposto l'annullamento senza rinvio della sentenza impugnata, condannandosi ex lege la ricorrente alle spese del presente giudizio in assenza di diverso accordo tra le parti; P.Q.M P.Q.M2 J4P,k 2026' 2