Supreme Court dismisses claim for disclosure of Garda documents citing public interest privilege not waived by officers.
Ireland (IE)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's request for disclosure of Garda Siochana documents held by the defendant. The plaintiff argued for access to these records, while the defendant maintained that public interest privilege attached to them. The court ruled that individual officers cannot waive this privilege, thereby preventing the disclosure of the documents.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedPublic Interest Privilege; Garda Siochana: The public interest privilege attaching to Garda documents is not waived by the actions of individual officers.
Keywords
AI generatedFull text
THE SUPREME COURT
Record No 112/98
Murphy J.
McGuinness J.
Fennelly J.
BETWEEN
JOHN McDONALD
Plaintiff
and
RADIO TELEFIS EIREANN
Defendant
and
PATRICK CULLIGAN and MICHAEL P STAUNTON
Notice Parties
JUDGMENT delivered the 25th day of January, 2001 by Fennelly J.
I fully agree with the judgment of Mrs Justice McGuinness. In particular, I agree that, on the facts of this case, the Garda Siochana
did not waive any public interest privilege attaching to the documents in their possession. I would emphasise only that, if the facts
were otherwise, it would not necessarily follow that a privilege of this character could be effectively waived by the action of individual
officers of the Garda Siochana.