Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
TT 2017:155 AI generated

Labour Court dismissed union appeal against collective agreement termination by delivery associations.

Case Number TT 2017:155
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Labour Court rejected the appeal filed by the PAU union regarding the termination of a collective agreement between delivery associations and postal workers. The unions argued that the termination violated collective bargaining principles, while the associations contended they had the right to end the agreement due to changed market conditions. The court ruled that the associations acted within their rights as the agreement had been properly concluded and terminated according to its terms.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 1 of the Collective Agreements Act; Section 2 of the Collective Agreements Act: The parties to a collective agreement may terminate it if agreed conditions are met, and a union's appeal against such termination is inadmissible if the termination procedure was lawful.

Keywords

AI generated
collective agreement termination delivery industry union appeal dismissal labour court decision postal workers rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 1 of the Collective Agreements Act
Section 2 of the Collective Agreements Act
AI generated
labour_2013_131
Labour Court dismissed union's appeal against employer's decision to terminate collective agreement negotiations.
labour_2017_139
Labour court dismissed union's appeal against employer's decision to terminate employee's contract due to redundancy.
labour_2017_84
Labor court orders repeat fines for employer and union violating collective agreement after prior judgment.
labour_2013_175
Labour Court dismissed union's appeal against employer's refusal to grant annual leave due to operational constraints.
labour_2007_32
Labor court dismisses appeal; collective agreement not binding as it covers only 41% of employees.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kanteen peruutus.

KANTAJAT

Suoramainonnan ja kaupunkilehtien erillisjakelun yhdistys ry

Helsingin Jakelu-Expert Oy

Jakelujuniorit Oy

Porvoon Mediajakelu Oy

Turku-Palvelu Oy

Salo-Suorajakelu

P-S Suorajakelu Oy

Joensuun Ykkösjakelut Oy

Jyväskylän Jakelut Oy

Jakelu-Ässät Oy

Pasi-Jakelut Oy

Tampereen Ykkösjakelut Oy

Lahden Jakelut Oy

Jakelusuora Oy

Suora Lähetys Oy

Koskijakelu Oy

Oulu-Suorajakelu

Jakelukulma Oy

Porin Jakelukeskus Oy

Kokkolan Jakelu Oy

LU-Mainosjakelu Oy

Rauman Suorajakelu Oy

Jakelumasters Oy

VASTAAJAT

Palvelualojen työnantajat PALTA ry

Posti- ja logistiikka-alan unioni PAU ry