Labour Court dismissed union's claim for breach of collective agreement due to employer's valid operational necessity defense.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Labour Court dismissed the union's complaint alleging a breach of the collective agreement regarding work hours. The employer argued that the reduced hours were necessary for operational reasons and that the agreement allowed for such adjustments. The court found that the employer's actions were justified by legitimate business needs and did not constitute a violation of the contract terms.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedTyöehtosopimuslain 10 §; Työehtosopimuslain 11 §: The court held that an employer may unilaterally adjust working hours under a collective agreement if the change is necessary for operational reasons and does not violate the fundamental principles of the agreement.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Antopäivä 2.3.2012
Diaarinro R 11/12
TYÖTUOMIOISTUIN PÄÄTÖS NRO 32
KANTAJA
Metallityöväen Liitto ry
VASTAAJA
Teknologiateollisuus ry
KUULTAVA
Valmet Automotive Oy
ASIA
Työehtosopimuksen tieten rikkominen