Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 2/2018 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal where lower court failed to examine a new plaintiff's complaint after setting a new deadline.

Case Number KKO 2/2018
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the appeal against a district court's decision to set a new deadline for filing an appeal. The district court had notified the opposing party of this new deadline without explicitly stating that it did not apply to the original plaintiff. Consequently, the court failed to examine the new complaint filed by the plaintiff after the original deadline had passed. The court ruled that the lower court was obligated to review the new plaintiff's complaint because the notification was ambiguous regarding its scope.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Korkein oikeus 1097/2017; 1098/2017: When a lower court sets a new deadline for an appeal without clearly excluding the original plaintiff, it must examine complaints filed by the original plaintiff after the initial deadline expires.

Keywords

AI generated
appeal deadline extension plaintiff notification scope procedural error dismissal new complaint examination ambiguity in court order

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Korkein oikeus 1097/2017
Korkein oikeus 1098/2017
AI generated
kko-precedent_1997_203
Supreme Court allows late divorce property separation claim by applying procedural time limit rules to filing date instead of service date.
kko-precedent_1988_92
Supreme Court extends appeal deadline for unrepresented defendant who missed filing due to late receipt of court record.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2018:1
Supreme Court allows late appeal by non-party due to misleading court decision extending deadline only for another party.
kko-other_2022_430
Supreme Court allows deportation order in deportation case where client failed to prove right to stay.
kko-precedent_2002_99
Supreme Court extends appeal period when defendant claims undelivered court notice without cause to doubt.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Käräjäoikeus oli asettanut rikosasian vastaajan hakemuksesta päätöksellään valituksen tekemiselle hovioikeuteen uuden määräajan ja tiedottanut päätöksestä myös hakijan vastapuolille. Koska päätöksestä ei selvästi käynyt ilmi, että uusi määräaika ei koskenut hakijan vastapuolia, käräjäoikeuden olisi tullut tutkia alkuperäisen valitusmääräajan jälkeen saapunut asianomistajan valitus.