Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding civil liability for damages in a subsequent permission to continue proceedings case.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the lower court's decision to deny a subsequent permission to continue proceedings. The applicant argued that the lower court failed to properly assess civil liability for damages in the context of the proceedings. The court held that the lower court correctly applied the law by finding no sufficient grounds to grant the permission based on the established facts.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedLaki 1093/1991, 10 luku, 1 §; Laki 1093/1991, 10 luku, 2 §: The Supreme Court ruled that a subsequent permission to continue proceedings cannot be granted if the applicant fails to demonstrate sufficient civil liability for damages or other statutory requirements.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Kysymys jatkokäsittelyluvan myöntämisen edellytyksistä vahingontekoa koskevassa asiassa.