Supreme Court determines that profits from subsequent drug purchases are not part of the total illegal gain.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court ruled that the defendant's illegal gain must be calculated based solely on the proceeds from the initial marijuana trafficking operation. The court held that subsequent purchases of drugs, financed by the initial sale, do not constitute additional illegal income. Consequently, the financial benefit derived from these later transactions was excluded from the total amount of illicit profit.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedRikoslain 10. luku 10 a. l.; Rikoslain 10. luku 10 b. l.: The court established that proceeds from subsequent criminal acts, funded by the initial crime, are not included in the calculation of the total illegal gain.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
A oli kuriireja käyttäen ja muutoin yhdessä toisten kanssa toimien tuonut maahan ja levittänyt useita suuria eriä marihuanaa. Myöhempien huumausaine-erien osto oli rahoitettu aiempien erien myynnistä saaduilla tuloilla. Kysymys A:n rikoksen tuottaman taloudellisen hyödyn määrittämisestä.