KKO 1752/2016
AI generated
Supreme Court rules that a planning agreement's hiking trail clause binds new owners based on the master plan.
Finland (FI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court upheld the binding nature of a hiking trail clause in a land use agreement against a new property owner. The plaintiff argued the clause should not apply to subsequent owners, while the defendant relied on the master plan's provisions. The court decided that the agreement's terms, grounded in the master plan, effectively bind successors to the land.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedKorkein oikeus 1752/2016; The Supreme Court held that a condition in a planning agreement regarding a hiking trail binds the new owner of the property in accordance with the master plan.
Keywords
AI generated
planning agreement
hiking trail
new owner
master plan
binding effect
property rights
land use
Related Decisions
AI generatedkko-precedent_2001_74
Supreme Court dismisses claim of ownership defect regarding a zoning plan's green area affecting property value.
kho-other_2016_3885
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeals against a zoning plan amendment due to lack of procedural bias grounds.
admin_2003_hameenlinna__519
Administrative court dismissed appeal against municipal land use agreement requiring owner to share planning costs.
kho-other_2014_3028
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against city council's plan extension for coastal tourism services.
kho-precedent_2004_33
Supreme Administrative Court partially allowed appeal against zoning plan creating industrial zone adjacent to residential properties.
Full text
Kysymys kaavoitus- ja maankäyttösopimuksen ulkoilureittiä koskevan sopimusehdon sitovuudesta kiinteistön uutta omistajaa kohtaan ja ulkoilureittitoimituksesta asemakaavan perusteella.