Supreme Court found lower court failed to justify sentence length, requiring detailed reasoning on sentencing factors.

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the appeal regarding the lower court's failure to provide sufficient reasoning for the imposed sentence. The appellant argued the appellate court did not adequately explain the factors influencing the sentence length under the relevant criminal procedure statutes. Consequently, the court ruled that the lower court violated its duty to give reasons by omitting a detailed justification for the specific sentencing decision.