Legislator Case Law & Legislation
KKO 202/2012 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal withdrawal objection, ruling withdrawal does not automatically suspend oral hearing proceedings.

Case Number KKO 202/2012
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's objection to the court's decision to proceed with an oral hearing after the applicant withdrew their appeal. The applicant argued that withdrawal should have halted the process, but the court found no legal basis for such a suspension. Consequently, the court ruled that the procedural timeline continues despite the withdrawal, ensuring judicial efficiency.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Laki 1093/1999 (1093/1999); Laki 621/1999 (621/1999): The withdrawal of an appeal does not automatically suspend the court's obligation to conduct an oral hearing or other procedural steps.

Keywords

AI generated
appeal withdrawal procedural suspension oral hearing supreme court procedural timeline

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Laki 1093/1999
Laki 621/1999
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Hakijan peruutettua valituksensa lausunnon antaminen asiassa on rauennut.