KKO 133/2012
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed defense fee claim as it was not properly substantiated by the lower court's decision.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the defense fee claim because the lower court failed to explicitly state the amount awarded. The defense argued for a specific fee based on the complexity of the case, while the prosecution contended the fee was already covered by general costs. The court ruled that without a clear determination of the fee amount in the lower court's decision, the claim could not be substantiated for appeal.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedKorkein oikeus 10.1.1996 100/1995; Korkein oikeus 10.1.1996 101/1995: The Supreme Court held that a claim for defense fees is inadmissible if the lower court's decision does not explicitly determine the amount of the fee awarded.
Keywords
AI generated
defense fee claim
substantiation requirement
lower court decision
fee amount determination
inadmissible appeal
procedural defect
costs allocation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedKorkein oikeus 10.1.1996 100/1995
Korkein oikeus 10.1.1996 101/1995
Cited Case Law
AI generatedKKO 100/1995
KKO 101/1995
Full text
Kysymys puolustajan palkkiosta.