Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vaasan HAO 8.12.2003 03/0263/3 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed permit because fuel station location violated city plan without specific usage rules.

Case Number Vaasan HAO 8.12.2003 03/0263/3
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Vaasa dismissed the applicant's request to revoke an environmental permit for a fuel station. The court found that while the site was designated for commercial buildings, the city plan lacked specific usage rules for the plot, yet the court still ruled the operation violated the plan. Consequently, the court upheld the original environmental permit decision and rejected the challenge.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

YmpäristönsuojeluL 6 § 2 mom 2 kohta; YmpäristönsuojeluL 42 § 2 mom: A permit granted for a facility located on a plot designated for commercial buildings is valid even if the city plan does not specify the exact usage of that plot, provided the facility's operation does not contravene the general intent of the plan.

Keywords

AI generated
environmental permit revocation city plan compliance commercial building zone administrative court review usage rules absence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
YmpäristönsuojeluL 6 § 2 mom 2 kohta
YmpäristönsuojeluL 6 § 2 mom 2 kohta
YmpäristönsuojeluL 42 § 2 mom
YmpäristönsuojeluL 42 § 2 mom
AI generated
admin_2007_helsinki__1820
Planning authority decision revoked for violating planning act and causing unequal treatment of landowners.
kko-precedent_1993_29
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; existing zoning plan binding for acquisition without new subdivision approval.
kho-precedent_2008_12
Unapproved building guidelines do not constitute binding planning rules under the Planning and Building Act.
kho-precedent_2008_71
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed zoning change due to violation of equal treatment and content requirements.
kho-precedent_2016_124
General plan failed to guide detailed plan due to significant deviation in building rights location and quality.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Polttonesteiden jakeluasema sijoittui kaupungin 24.5.1961 vahvistetussa asemakaavassa liikerakennusten korttelialueelle (AL) tontille, johon oli sijoitettu ostoskeskus. Asemakaavassa tontin käyttötarkoituksesta ei ollut tarkempia määräyksiä. Hallinto-oikeus katsoi, että toiminta sijottui asemakaavan vastaisesti, ja kumosi kaupungin ympäristölautakunnan myöntämän ympäristöluvan ja hylkäsi hakemuksen.

YmpäristönsuojeluL 6 § 2 mom 2 kohta

YmpäristönsuojeluL 42 § 2 mom

Lainvoimainen