Court dismissed enforcement of administrative penalty for illegal construction due to lack of final administrative decision.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the enforcement proceedings initiated against the defendant for alleged violations of building regulations. The plaintiff argued that the defendant had committed illegal construction, but the court found no final administrative decision establishing the violation. Consequently, the court ruled that enforcement could not proceed without a legally binding administrative act confirming the breach.
Legislator headnote
AI generateds. 100 of the Enforcement Act; s. 101 of the Enforcement Act: Enforcement proceedings cannot be initiated or continued against a party unless there exists a final administrative decision establishing the violation or obligation.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
! "# $ %&' '
$"
()*+, (-(./.0 # % &%0 "
11111111111111111111111111111
2" , 03!0
!
"#
""
$
%&'()*%&+&
,
-
- .- &+-'/-&'')-- +01'
*
2/'' *
-
2
2-
$$ !"
" ! ""0 " $" " "0
$$
!# # "
0 # $$
#"
$$ #
" 4 !$ " " !$ 0 "
#"
$$ #!##
," #0$$ "" "" $#,5 " " "0 "
"
" !
# 6,5 " !7 $$ """ #
$ #### ##6,5 " !7
8
"$$ !
,5% " $ # "0"
" #" # # $# # ""
# ##0 # " #
$ $" # ! $ "0
" " "
$$ " ""
##6,57
6 7
*
%
!"# 0"" !"$
%&' ' $" "!#
8 # $"4" $
0
$ 2" , "
$ %&' ' 0 ""
$ $" (
,
9
$$ % !" $$#
# " #
&
#$ "# " "
. $
"0 ! " $" "!
!
##
,5% " !
" $$$
#
::##%#6
&
## 7
,5 " $ 0
$"!$" " $$
#
$" " " "$$#
" "
# $ 0
" " "
# # 5 % $ #$
"
! "# "
# , 5 "
$ 0
$ $" "! "
$
" "# "
# "
#$
$$
, 5 "
" $$ # !:: "
# $ " $#
::## # 5% "! $ #$
$" "
$ " !:: " # "4#
" !## ## ""
0
!"
$" " ! " $$#
$ " !:: " #
"4#
/" # $"#0$ " " !"
$" "! "
$$#
,5% " ! $ #$
" # $
"# "4#0 (
,
9
0""
!
0
$ #
, "
$"$" $ %&' ' ,5
" " ""!#
" !"0 $" "# # "
"##$$
# $ $
#0 $ #,5% "
!
" , 5 " !
$
$ $"#
$# #
" # 4"# # 5 & "
"
#
# #0
" "!!
$# # " # $
0 $
"
$# #$"#
$ # 5
"
" # $ " $" " !
$
$ " "