Court dismissed execution objection against a final administrative decision regarding a building permit. The court rejected the applicant's procedural arguments and upheld the original administrative ruling. The court ruled that the administrative body correctly applied the law and the execution order was valid. The applicant failed to demonstrate any legal error in the administrative proceedings. The court emphasized the finality of administrative decisions and the proper execution of public authority orders. The applicant's arguments were deemed insufficient to overturn the established legal order.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the execution objection filed by the applicant against a final administrative decision regarding a building permit. The applicant argued that the administrative body made procedural errors and failed to consider relevant facts, but the court found no such defects in the record. The court ruled that the administrative decision was lawful and that the execution order must be enforced as issued.
Legislator headnote
AI generateds. 100 of the Code of Administrative Justice; s. 101 of the Code of Administrative Justice: The court must dismiss an execution objection if the administrative decision is final and the applicant fails to prove a legal error or new facts warranting a review.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
!" "#$!
!" "#$!% & '()'+ %!,%%$# $+
'./*01+*
!" # $%&'(%&)' * +, )%-.%-)..'-- '/001)..' ,, +, )%-.%-)..'-- '/001)..'(,, ( - 2 ,- + + & & + & 2 + ( 33 & ,," 22 3&% & & & &4 $
5 6 0 33 &
## 7 2 + !" "#$!
!" "#$!% !, ( +
!" "#$! !" "#$!%&& + 0 8 $ 3 & + 8 , + % 0 &
08, & +08 3 + &+ + 99 0 08 !& & + 8 , 0 8 : & & & 8 ! 1& , % # , +08 %&# 08 & & & & + 08, & % + 99 & 1& & &+ + 08, & + . 1& % % % !% + & & + 22 + 5+ ; 6 + 08 !& 08 , & % + 33 +& + +& + &0& !" "#$! !" "#$!%08 !&