Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
SS-27293/2019-KBH ECLI:DK:KBH:2025:SS0000000386 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal regarding illegal expiration of prosecution for drug offense under Danish Criminal Law.

Case Number SS-27293/2019-KBH
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the appeal against the decision on lawful expiration of prosecution for a drug-related offense. The prosecution alleged violations of the Criminal Law and drug legislation, while the defense argued the statute of limitations had expired. The court ruled that the procedural requirements for expiration were met, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Straffelovens § 245, stk. 1, jf. § 247, stk. 1; The court established that the prosecution for drug offenses expires according to statutory time limits if no action is taken within the prescribed period.

Keywords

AI generated
lawful expiration of prosecution drug offenses Criminal Law Denmark statute of limitations criminal appeal procedural dismissal euphoric substances

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Straffelovens § 245, stk. 1, jf. § 247, stk. 1
tiltale for overtrædelse af straffelovens § 245, stk. 1, jf. § 247, stk. 1, og lovgivningen om euforiserende stoffer
lovgivningen om euforiserende stoffer
1, og lovgivningen om euforiserende stoffer
AI generated
SS-229/2022-OLR
Appeal dismissed as late; prosecution failed to meet strict time limits for enforcing Danish sentence.
SS-1190/2021-OLR
Appeal dismissed because defendant failed to appear without documented legal excuse in criminal proceedings.
SS-483/2009-OLR
Appeal dismissed because prosecution failed to meet strict deadline for filing appeal against defendant.
SS-176/2025-GLR
Appeal dismissed because defendant failed to prove lawful absence from court without valid excuse.
BS-1923/2016-OLR
Appeal allowed because digital filing after office hours counts as timely under new statute.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sag om anke og lovligt forfald, vedr. tiltale for overtrædelse af straffelovens § 245, stk. 1, jf. § 247, stk. 1, og lovgivningen om euforiserende stoffer

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)

Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:

Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag.

Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende

afgørelser.

De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i

Domsdatabasen.