Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
SS-129/2025-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2025:SS0000000204 AI generated

Court upholds detention order under criminal procedure law due to risk of flight and obstruction of justice.

Case Number SS-129/2025-VLR
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court upheld the lower court's decision to extend the defendant's pre-trial detention. The defendant argued for release, but the prosecution and lower court maintained that the statutory grounds for continued detention were met. The appellate court found no error in the lower court's application of the law regarding the specific risks involved.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Retsplejelovens § 762, stk. 1, nr. 3; jf. § 765, stk. 2, nr. 3: A court may order continued pre-trial detention if there is a risk of flight or obstruction of justice, provided the measure is necessary and proportionate.

Keywords

AI generated
pre-trial detention risk of flight obstruction of justice criminal procedure law appellate review detention order proportionality test

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Retsplejelovens § 762, stk. 1, nr. 3
januar 2025 har byretten afsagt kendelse om fortsat varetægtsfængsling af Sigtede 2 i medfør af retsplejelovens § 762, stk. 1, nr. 3, jf.
Retsplejelovens § 765, stk. 2, nr. 3
AI generated
SS-407/2010-OLR
Court upholds lower court ruling to release defendant on bail after statutory time limit expired.
SS-2570/2009-VLR
Court orders continued pre-trial detention for defendant pending final judgment on criminal charges.
SS-7/2025-OLR
Appeal dismissed; detention under Home Return Act upheld for suspected Section 174 violation.
SS-2854/2022-OLR
Landsret upheld pretrial detention of an asylum seeker as proportional despite Højesteret's prior ruling.
SS-472/2024-VLR
Court allows pre-trial detention for three defendants as statutory conditions under the Criminal Procedure Act are met.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Landsretten stadfæster byrettens kendelse således, at sigtede skal være fortsat varetægtsfængslet

[DOKUMENT] Retsbog med kendelse (2 sider) Vestre Landsrets 6. afdeling holdt den 22. januar 2025 kl. 11.20 møde på tingstedet i Vi-borg.

Som dommere fungerede landsdommerne Hanne Harritz Pedersen, Malene Værum West-mark og Thomas Steensen (kst.).

V.L. S – 0129 – 25

Anklagemyndigheden mod Sigtede 2 Dato (Født 1998)

Fremlagte bilag:

− mail af 21. januar 2025 fra forsvareren, advokat Kåre Pihlmann − mail af 22. januar 2025 med bilag fra Østjyllands Politi.

Den 14. januar 2025 har byretten afsagt kendelse om fortsat varetægtsfængsling af Sigtede 2 i medfør af retsplejelovens § 762, stk. 1, nr. 3, jf. § 765, stk. 2, nr. 3.

Kendelsen er kæret af Sigtede 2 med påstand om løsladelse.

Landsretten afsagde

K e n d e l s e:

Landsretten er enig i byrettens resultat og begrundelsen herfor. Det, der er anført for lands-retten, kan ikke føre til et andet resultat.

Landsretten stadfæster derfor byrettens kendelse.

T h i b e s t e m m e s:

Byrettens kendelse stadfæstes.

Sagen sluttet.

Hanne Harritz Pedersen