Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
BS-119/2024-OLR ECLI:DK:OLR:2025:BS0000000288 AI generated

Court dismisses debt collection claim because collection law conditions were not met and court rejected payment demand.

Case Number BS-119/2024-OLR
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court upheld the district court's decision to reject the plaintiff's payment claim. The plaintiff argued that the debt was valid, but the court found that the specific conditions required by the collection law were not satisfied. Consequently, the court ruled that the procedural prerequisites for enforcing the debt were absent.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Inkassoloven § 11; Retsplejeloven 477 b, stk. 2: The court must reject a payment claim if the statutory conditions for collection enforcement are not fulfilled.

Keywords

AI generated
collection law conditions payment claim rejection procedural prerequisites debt enforcement court of appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Inkassoloven § 11
Retsplejeloven 477 b, stk. 2
Inkassoloven § 10
AI generated
BS-49/2018-VLR
Court allows separate payment claims under DSR 249(1) when claims exceed 50,000 DKK each.
BS-307/2011-OLR
Court upholds dismissal of payment claim due to failure to disclose signer's position at creditor.
BS-327/2010-OLR
Court allows costs for enforcement of final judgment when collection law's advance payment requirement is not met.
BS-2638/2008-OLR
Court dismisses appeal against dismissal due to procedural time limit violation by defendant's counsel.
BS-2540/2017-OLR
High court upholds dismissal of payment claim due to missing domicile of one debtor and failure to correct.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Landsretten stadfæster byrettens kendelse, og tiltræder dermed at betingelserne i inkassolovens § 11 ikke er opfyldt, og at fogedretten har afvist betalingspåkravet, jf. retsplejelovens 477 b, stk. 2, jf. inkassolovens § 10

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)

Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:

Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag.

Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende

afgørelser.

De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i

Domsdatabasen.