Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
FS-5185/2023-NYK ECLI:DK:NYK:2025:FS0000000003 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal regarding lease termination validity and timely objection under Danish lease law.

Case Number FS-5185/2023-NYK
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the appeal concerning the validity of a lease termination and the timeliness of objections under the lease act. The lower court found that the landlord properly terminated the lease and that the tenant failed to raise objections within the statutory period. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the tenant did not demonstrate a legal error in the termination proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Lejelovens § 176, stk. 1, jf. stk. 2; A lease termination is valid if served correctly and objections are not raised within the prescribed time limit, rendering late objections inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
lease termination validity timely objection requirement statutory objection period landlord tenant dispute lease act provisions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Lejelovens § 176, stk. 1, jf. stk. 2
Sag om hvorvidt opsigelse af lejemål er gyldig, og hvorvidt der rettidigt er fremsat indsigelser til opsigelsen i henhold til lejelovens § 176, stk. 1, jf. stk. 2
AI generated
BS-44313/2021-BOR
Landlord's notice dismissed due to failure to provide one-year statutory notice for business tenancy termination.
BS-32135/2021-HJR
Housing law: Email objection to termination deemed timely due to prior email communication and confirmation.
BS-31128/2022-LYN
Court allows landlord termination of accessory room lease citing owner occupancy as valid reason.
BS-332/2021-HEL
Court dismisses tenant's claim that rent increase notice was invalid, upholding landlord's right to raise rent.
BS-58428/2023-GLO
Dismissed: Employer terminated employee on 122nd sick day; court held termination valid as sent after 120-day period expired.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sag om hvorvidt opsigelse af lejemål er gyldig, og hvorvidt der rettidigt er fremsat indsigelser til opsigelsen i henhold til lejelovens § 176, stk. 1, jf. stk. 2

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)

Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:

Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag.

Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende

afgørelser.

De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i

Domsdatabasen.