SS-1657/2017-HJO
ECLI:DK:HJO:2023:SS0000000871
AI generated
Defense lawyer's travel time fees dismissed as not covered by standard retainer agreement terms.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the claim for additional fees regarding the defense lawyer's travel time. The lawyer argued that reimbursement was necessary due to the client's location, while the opposing party contended that the retainer agreement did not cover such expenses. The court ruled that without explicit agreement or statutory basis, travel time cannot be charged separately from the standard fee structure.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedStraffeforsikringsloven § 10; Straffesagsforsikringsordningen: Travel time expenses for defense counsel are not automatically reimbursable absent specific contractual stipulation or statutory authorization.
Keywords
AI generated
defense lawyer fees
travel time reimbursement
retainer agreement terms
criminal defense costs
fee structure limitations
Related Decisions
AI generatedSS-3856/2009-ARH
Court dismisses lawyer's request to lift travel ban due to serious theft charge and lack of prior client relationship.
BS-563/2016-HEL
Court awards attorney fees but denies travel expenses due to prior claim waiver.
SS-2320/2009-VLR
Travel expenses for defense visits to a detained client are allowed if they match the standard for a defense lawyer in the Aarhus district.
SS-8400/2014-ODE
Court dismisses lawyer's travel ban lift request due to uncomplicated case and high travel costs.
SS-376/2008-HJR
Supreme Court lifts travel deposit condition for defense lawyer due to reasonable interest in appointment.
Full text
Sag om, hvorvidt den beskikkede forsvarer skulle lægges salær for rejsetid