Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
BS-1634/2015-ALB ECLI:DK:ALB:2022:BS0000000841 AI generated

Court rejects expert dismissal request due to insufficient grounds based on price estimate and case scope.

Case Number BS-1634/2015-ALB
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Denmark (DK)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court ruled that there was insufficient basis to dismiss the expert witness Person 1 based on the parties' objections. The court noted the price estimate and the scope of the inquiry but found these factors inadequate for rejection. Consequently, the expert was appointed unless the opposing party withdrew the request or agreed to a different expert by the deadline.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 106 af Rettsplejeloven; s. 107 af Rettsplejeloven: The court must evaluate objections to an expert witness appointment; a price estimate alone does not constitute sufficient grounds for dismissal if the expert's qualifications and the case scope are otherwise appropriate.

Keywords

AI generated
expert witness appointment objections to expert price estimate relevance court discretion civil procedure rules

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 106 af Rettsplejeloven
s. 107 af Rettsplejeloven
AI generated
SS-1565/2016-OLR
Appeal dismissed; court upholds lower court ruling allowing authorized lawyer assistant to represent appointed defender in extension hearing.
BS-44623/2021-KBH
Employment termination damages partially allowed; court rejects unsupported claims and awards costs.
BS-51536/2024-VLR
Court upholds police liability for dog injury, rejecting insurer's direct claim exclusion.
BS-43951/2018-HEL
Court allowed appeal against administrative decision regarding Part A ApS case resumption.
BS-2663/2007-ROS
Court awarded attorney fees to plaintiff against defendants and state treasury in civil litigation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sag om, hvorvidt sagkyndige kan afvises

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider) RETTEN I AALBORG

Udskrift af retsbogen

Den 15. marts 2016 kl. 15:15 blev retten sat på dommerens kontor af Dommer

Der blev foretaget i ikke offentligt retsmøde sag nr. BS 99-1634/2015:

Part 1 (Enkeltmandsvirksomhed)

Adresse 1 9600 Aars mod Part A Adresse 2 9600 Aars

Ingen var indkaldt eller mødt.

Der blev fremlagt:

- udspecificering af prisoverslaget fra Person 1 ,

- mail af 2. marts 2016 fra advokat Jan Poulsen,

- mail af 7. marts 2016 fra advokat Erik Braad.

Efter de foreliggende oplysninger, herunder oplysningerne om prisoverslaget sammenholdt med spørgetemaets omfang og karakter finder retten, at der ikke er tilstrækkeligt grundlag for at afvise Person 1 som sagkyndig på baggrund af parternes indsigelser.

Retten forventer derfor at udmelde Person 1 som sagkyndig, medmindre sagsøgtes advokat senest den 22. marts 2016 oplyser, at begæringen om indhentelse af sagkyndig erklæring tilbagekaldes, eller at parterne senest samme dato bliver enige om en anden sagkyndig.

Sagen udsat.

Retten hævet.

Dommer